The cost is rarely where people look for it
In one national medicines network, depot storage accounted for 78% of total spend. Transport accounted for 20%. Overnight stops, 2%.
- 78% storage
- 20% transport
- 2% overnight stops
Most optimisation effort goes into routing, because routing is visible and easy to measure. But in a network holding buffer stock across dozens of depots, the decisions that actually move the cost base are where stock sits and how much of it there is. Finding that out required modelling storage, transport and overnight costs separately rather than as one blended figure — and it changed what the client did next.
How we work →
The same five stages, every time
What distinguishes a practice from a contractor is a method that repeats. Ours is deliberately conservative: it favours results that hold up under challenge over results that look impressive.
- 01Build a real road network. Real roads, with turn restrictions, tolls and measured speeds — not straight lines.
- 02Model demand and cost by activity. Storage, transport and overnight costs separated, because they answer to different decisions.
- 03Solve, rather than estimate. A constraint solver against stated constraints, so every recommendation has a reason behind it.
- 04Compare scenarios, not a single answer. A structured grid of scenarios, so the client sees the shape of the trade-off.
- 05Hand over the tooling. Where the engagement warrants it, the model itself — as an application the client can run.
The method in full →
Discuss a network